COMMENTARY FROM PERRY DIAZ
Republican Vice Presidential Sarah Palin has been accusing Barack Obama a “socialist” and for “spreading the wealth around.” Well, if we used Palin’s criteria of a “socialist,” then she would fit as a “socialist” herself. Actually, she used the words “sharing the wealth” as opposed to “spreading the wealth” which would really make her a “communist.”
Sarah Palin, proud socialist
Posted by Mark Frauenfelder, October 28, 2008
The best part of Hendrik Hertzberg’s excellent New Yorker commentary about McCain and Palin’s failed attempt to convince people that Obama is a socialist is the final paragraph containing this boast from Gov. Sarah Palin:
The state that she governs has no income or sales tax. Instead, it imposes huge levies on the oil companies that lease its oil fields. The proceeds finance the government’s activities and enable it to issue a four-figure annual check to every man, woman, and child in the state. One of the reasons Palin has been a popular governor is that she added an extra twelve hundred dollars to this year’s check, bringing the per-person total to $3,269. A few weeks before she was nominated for Vice-President, she told a visiting journalist—Philip Gourevitch, of this magazine—that “we’re set up, unlike other states in the union, where it’s collectively Alaskans own the resources. So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs.” Perhaps there is some meaningful distinction between spreading the wealth and sharing it (“collectively,” no less), but finding it would require the analytic skills of Karl the Marxist.